Skip Nav Destination
Article navigation
Volume 64, Issue 7_Supplement
1 April 2004
- Previous Article
- Next Article
-
Abstract
Experimental and Molecular Therapeutics 39: Novel Therapeutic Agents IV: Small Molecule Inhibitors| April 01 2004
Judith S. Sebolt-Leopold;
Judith S. Sebolt-Leopold
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Ronald Merriman;
Ronald Merriman
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Charles Omer;
Charles Omer
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Haile Tecle;
Haile Tecle
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Alex Bridges;
Alex Bridges
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Wayne Klohs;
Wayne Klohs
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Cho-Ming Loi;
Cho-Ming Loi
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Heather Valik;
Heather Valik
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Sally Przybranowski;
Sally Przybranowski
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Mark Meyer;
Mark Meyer
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
W. R. Leopold
W. R. Leopold
Pfizer Global Research & Development, Ann Arbor, MI
Search for other works by this author on:
This Site
Author & Article Information
Online ISSN: 1538-7445
Print ISSN: 0008-5472
American Association for Cancer Research
2004
Cancer Res (2004) 64 (7_Supplement): 925.
- Split-Screen
- Views Icon Views
- Article contents
- Figures & tables
- Video
- Audio
- Supplementary Data
- Peer Review
- Tools Icon Tools
Cite Icon Cite
- Search Site
- Article Versions Icon Versions
- Version of Record April 1 2004
Citation
Judith S. Sebolt-Leopold, Ronald Merriman, Charles Omer, Haile Tecle, Alex Bridges, Wayne Klohs, Cho-Ming Loi, Heather Valik, Sally Przybranowski, Mark Meyer, W. R. Leopold; The biological profile of PD 0325901: A second generation analog of CI-1040 with improved pharmaceutical potential. Cancer Res 1 April 2004; 64 (7_Supplement): 925.
Download citation file:
- Ris (Zotero)
- Reference Manager
- EasyBib
- Bookends
- Mendeley
- Papers
- EndNote
- RefWorks
- BibTex
Abstract
4003
CI-1040, the first MEK inhibitor to enter clinical evaluation, was advanced into development based on promising preclinical activity. While Phase 1 data pointed to promising hints of clinical activity, efficacy in Phase 2 single agent screening studies was insufficient to warrant continued development. Target suppression in Phase 1 tumor biopsies was < 90% in 8 of 11 tumors tested and the assessment of MEK as a viable drug target remained unconfirmed. The finding that CI-1040 was clinically well tolerated at doses that clearly resulted in significant MEK inhibition provided the impetus to develop more potent MEK-targeted agents with greater systemic exposure. PD0325901 has been identified as a significantly more potent analog of CI-1040 with an improved pharmaceutical profile warranting clinical evaluation. Like CI-1040, PD0325901 is non-competitive with ATP and is exquisitely specific and highly potent against purified MEK, exhibiting a Kiapp of 1 nM against activated MEK1 and MEK2. PD0325901 is roughly 500-fold more potent than CI-1040 with respect to its cellular effects on phosphorylation of ERK1 and ERK2, exhibiting subnanomolar activity. The improved potency of PD0325901 relative to CI-1040 is also evident in vivo. A single oral dose of PD0325901 (25 mg/kg) suppressed phosphorylation of ERK by >50% at 24 hours post-dosing. In comparison, CI-1040 at a much higher dose (150 mg/kg) could only inhibit pERK levels for roughly 8 hours, returning to control levels by 24 hours after treatment. Oral efficacy comparisons revealed that the dose required to produce a 70% incidence of complete tumor responses (C26 model) was 25 mg/kg/day versus 900 mg/kg/day for PD0325901 and CI-1040, respectively. Anticancer activity of PD 0325901 has been demonstrated for a broad spectrum of human tumor xenografts, significantly inhibiting the growth of 6 out of 7 human tumor models tested. PD 0325901 was also shown to be highly efficacious and effective at inhibiting ERK phosphorylation when administered by the IV route. The improved anticancer activity of PD0325901 compared to CI-1040 is likely due to several contributing pharmacological factors, including longer duration and greater potency of MEK inhibition, as well as greater solubility leading to improved bioavailability, and increased metabolic stability. Based on its highly specific inhibition of MEK and its overall pharmaceutical profile, PD0325901 has the potential to provide ultimate validation of MEK as an anticancer drug target. Phase 1 trials with this agent are underway.
[Proc Amer Assoc Cancer Res, Volume 45, 2004]
American Association for Cancer Research
2004
Advertisement
299 Views
View Metrics
Citing articles via
Email alerts
Article Activity Alert
eTOC Alert
Close Modal
Breaking
GSK to Settle Zantac Lawsuits for $2.2 Billion
UK-wide Immunotherapy Collaboration Launches
Some Acne Creams Found to Contain Known Carcinogen
View more recent articles
Latest News
Nobel-Winning AI Advances Are Transforming Cancer Research
MicroRNAs, Focus of Nobel Prize, Highlight Untapped Potential
COVID-19 Vaccines Linked to Improved Survival in ICI-Treated Cancers
View more recent articles
Research Watch
Epigenetic Modification of Centromeric RNA Supports Genomic Stability
Patient Response to Immunotherapy Is Dictated by Five Latent Factors
Type 2 Immune Factors Enhance T Cell–Driven Antitumor Immune Responses
View more recent articles